This site is in archival mode. A replacement is being developed. In the meantime, please use the PBW2 Forums for community discussions. The replacement software for this site will use a unified account system with PBW2, and any newly created threads will carry over.
Welcome to Spaceempires.net
Login or Register

Search
Modules
· Content
· Downloads
· Forums
· Game Info
· Image Gallery
· Links
· Shipyards
· Topics
· Staff

User Info
· Welcome, Anonymous
Membership:
· New: Astorre
· New Today: 0
· New Yesterday: 0
· Overall: 3155

People Online:
· Visitors: 154
· Members: 0
· Total: 154

  

Current Poll Results

What sort of (SE4) leakiness do you prefer?


Both leaky shields and armor.
35 %35 %35 % 35.29% (12)
Leaky shields and regular armor.
14 %14 %14 % 14.71% (5)
Regular shields and leaky armor.
23 %23 %23 % 23.53% (8)
Stock magic walls for all! (ah, it rhymes)
26 %26 %26 % 26.47% (9)

Total Votes: 34


[ Voting Booth | Other Polls ]
 
Last 5 Surveys at Spaceempires.net

 Which game are you most looking forward to? (69 votes)

 How many new polls should we have a year? (16 votes)

 Which letter is more... lettery? (65 votes)

 Would you like to take a poll? (34 votes)

 How much is a new poll needed? (28 votes)

...more polls


"What sort of (SE4) leakiness do you prefer?" | Login/Create an Account | 1 comment
The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.

No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

Re: What sort of (SE4) leakiness do you prefer? (Score: 1)
by CaptainKwok on Thursday, December 14th @ 6:29 am GMT
(User Info | Send a Message | Journal)

This poll was better, although I'm detecting a hint of bias from the pollster. :P

All logos and trademarks used on this site, all comments and stories posted for reading, all files hosted for download,
and all art work hosted for viewing are property of their respective owners; all the rest copyright 2003-2010 Nolan Kelly.
Syndicate news: SpaceEmpires.net News RSS Feed - Syndicate forums: SpaceEmpires.net Forums RSS Feed
Page Generation: 0.13 Seconds