Search found 743 matches

I'm a little sad about PBC5 being dead in the water, especially when it looked like it would be an easier game for SJ to run.

So, any progress made towards the new PBC system?

give me some time to mourn the passing of PBC4. I'm *sniff* still kinda torn up about that... Razz

I never got to use most of my fleet, and only managed one tiny battle. Sad

Though, on the upside, ...

You will agree with my wall of text, no other opinions are allowed! Razz

I still think that the higher cost of some facilities in CBmod would cause people to not bother building that much (it may hel ...

What would happen is A) Players concentrate only on the breathable planets (as they'd be the only ones worth gaining a large amount of influence, B) Players don't bother building much on the planets ( ...

Just to check, it would be SEIV again, right?

Would we get more people to join, and would it be smaller in map size, initial empire size, or just by cramming more AIs in the same space?

Due to current budget issues, radioactives are no longer available as loan material.

Current resources available:
400k Minerals | 400k Organics | 0 Radioactives

Mercenaries are still needed, and will attain the same pay rate and prestige as before. Further advantages involve commanding forces more powerful than many FWSN task groups, with the confidence of fu ...

Indeed, there are still 10.3mT of fighters left with the current HB-DCI construction contract. Given that the bulk of that production is occurring in Zitrod (with a fair amount in Pembrook), and the s ...

Not that I want to harp on about this, but for a start, the DCIM assets could actually be consolidated into a proper fleet. If that were done, the remaining free DCI combat ships in Mveloem would be t ...

2419.7
Synth II
Archer: 253
Hakha: 9
Gahoch: 104
Skirr: 100
Telelance: 234

Aries: 14
DnS: 54
Daemon: 35

Tonnage: 22.24mT

Synth system (excl. Synth II)
Archer: 86
Hakha: 6
Skirr: 10 ...

Truth be told, I am extremely disappointed with the FWSN handling of my contract, and the ships encompassed by it.

DCI has provided large numbers of battle ready craft, with many are already within ...

Immense progress has been made since the early stages, when even 20 Obol yards could be viewed as an immense investment of time and resources.

DCI has already reached 44 such yards, spread across M ...

I'm alive (or maybe I'm a computer programme, and do not fulfil the conventional criteria for being 'alive'?).

When exactly will the 3 year mark be, and... can I get a free gift of some rads to cel ...

Noooooo...

Damn, I was going to submit my orders today. Can I list 2 sets of orders (one for a possible rerun, and another for 2419.7 if a rerun isn't possible)?

EDIT: I've had a look, and nothi ...

What is this talk of IC? It seems to be an attempt to distract major issue, which is a loss of resources. Now, I can see this was a communication mistake, but I hope this will not happen again - once ...

Does the Fii still hold a mercenary branch? I seek remove western assets form the FWSN contract we currently hold.

As can be seen, the forces in the region are not the largest, and work is being pe ...

http://home.spaceempires.net/ftopict-8800.html

The loan is aimed at propelling Southeastern into the relm of large scale profitability, and to insure that Dynacorp does not suffer from spoilage.
...

Sorry, I was away for 6 days, and only came back yesterday. I can have my orders in sometime tomorrow.

Contract conditions have been fulfilled.

I don't know about anyone else, but I'm read to switch to weekly turns now, though my orders for this turn will need to wait another 20hrs.

Two options come to mind:
1) Each section gets its own a net change + an overall budget change.
2) 'Overall net change' & 'Sans market net change'.

What do you and everyone else think?

One thing it has made me decide to do, rename my BSYs (just a simple 'Ceph' NAME, 'Mvel' NAME, etc) - I currently have no idea where anything is being built without loading the game!

Other than tha ...

Any chance for the 'Net Resources' bit to be put back in? I liked to ability to see the overall change.